I’ve learned that Action Research refers to a
systematic, intentional study of administrative practice and taking action for
change based on what is learned as a result of the inquiry. As I search ways to improve my method of
teaching, action research will become very beneficial to me. As I proceed in collecting data, analyzing
the data, evaluating results, and corresponding to solve problem, I, as others
have in the pass, will be able to seek out change and ways in developing a plan
of action that will enhance the overall improvement of the school. I’ve also learned that action research is
conducted by people from the “inside.”
It identifies questions or problems that are examined by a team who work
collaboratively then correspond to solve the problem. Dana discusses two paradigms. The first portraying teaching as a primarily
linear activity and depicts teachers and principals as technicians. While this
research has generated valuable insights into the teaching and learning
process, it resulted in traditional top-down “retraining” and remediation. The
second paradigm is the qualitative or interpretative studies, teaching, and
schooling which were portrayed as highly complex, context-specific, interactive
activities. Although qualitative or interpretive work attended to issues of
context, it limits the practitioners’ role in the research process; who are
best positioned to understand and better the educational experiences for all
members of the school, administrators, and teachers.
No comments:
Post a Comment