The title of my
Action Research Project is “How Can Technology Increase Fluency.” I haven’t
worked very much on my project since my last class but because I am nearing
EDLD 5398, I intend to spend more time working on it. At this time I have completed all except my
findings in section 4, my summary, conclusion and recommendations, conclusion,
reflections, recommendations, and concluding remarks. When I began this
research, I
intend to provide evidence that will explain where the breakdown in
comprehension occurs so that individuals will understand how to effectively
engage the students and ultimately lead them to success through the use of
technological tools. This research has been very successful. When I first began my project, most of my research came from the
Standardized TAKS Test but since the test has changed, I get my information
from the STAAR Test. The goal of my study is to
determine ways in which struggling readers can attain the skills to read with
speed, accuracy, and proper expression in order to understand what they’ve
read. A pioneer in literacy
research and practice points to evidence that speech recognition technology, which
is widely used in telephone call-routing and directory assistance, can be
tapped as a cost-effective and technically viable means to advance early
childhood literacy, particularly fluency. The ultimate goal of this study is to
find ways to aid in the student’s ability to
build their phonemic awareness skills, so they can “hear” all of the
sounds in words and blend them together to make words (Therrien &
Kubina
2006). With
the aid of technology, my research will identify ways
to develop fluency in beginning readers thus enabling
them to become more automatic
at decoding their reading.
As a result,
the reader will be able to interpret (decode) the words on the written page
easily and make sense or meaning (comprehension) of what is read. These readers
are said to have developed fluency in reading.
Therrien,
W. J., & Kubina, Jr., R. M. (2007). The Importance of Context in Repeated
Reading. Reading Improvement, 44(4),
179-188.
No comments:
Post a Comment